Claw vs Karza (Perfios) for Litigation and KYB Data
Karza, now part of Perfios, is a background-verification and KYB data platform where a litigation check is one module. Claw is a legaltech platform built for lawyers to search, cite, track, and manage cases. Here is how they actually compare, and which job each one does.
Comparison · Litigation Data & KYB
If you searched for a "Karza litigation check" alternative, you are probably trying to do one of two different things, and mixing them up wastes time. One job is a background check: does this person, company, or director have a litigation history, checked quickly and in bulk as part of onboarding or credit risk. The other job is legal case work: actually finding a judgment, reading it, citing it correctly, tracking a hearing, or managing a live matter. Karza, now sold under the Perfios brand, is built for the first job. Claw is built for the second. This page explains both, honestly, so you pick the right one.
- Different jobs: Karza (Perfios) does background verification and KYB data checks, with litigation as one module. Claw does legal case search, citation, tracking, and management.
- Karza (Perfios) is the specialist for bulk, API-based BFSI risk screening across credit, GST, ITR, and litigation data.
- Claw is built for legal teams: AI case search across 25 High Courts and the Supreme Court, case tracking across 8,200+ courts, an AI legal assistant, and compliance automation.
- Pricing: Karza/Perfios is custom quote-based. Claw has a free plan for individual advocates and paid seats around Rs 10,999/yr for teams.
01Two different jobs, one confusing search term
"Karza litigation check" is a well-known search term in Indian fintech and compliance circles, but it points to something narrower than most people expect. Karza Technologies was a Mumbai-based data-aggregation company, acquired by Perfios Software Solutions in 2022, and its litigation search is now offered under the Perfios brand, as part of products like the Legal Search Report and OneView. The old "Karza" name still gets searched constantly, which is why this comparison starts there.
The job Karza (Perfios) does: background verification at scale
Karza is not a legal research tool. It is a data platform built for banks, NBFCs, lenders, and onboarding teams who need to run a fast, automated check on a person or company before doing business with them. A litigation flag is one data point among many others it pulls together, alongside credit bureau data, GST and ITR filings, MCA company records, bank statement analysis, and identity documents. The job here is risk screening at volume: hundreds or thousands of names checked through an API, with a yes-or-no or a risk score as the output.
The job Claw does: finding, citing, and managing an actual case
Legal teams have a different problem. A lawyer or in-house counsel does not just need to know that a litigation exists. They need to find the judgment, read what it actually says, cite it correctly in a filing, track the next hearing date, and often manage the matter through to its conclusion. That is legal case search and case management, not a background-verification flag.
Why this mix-up matters
A background-verification platform and a legal case-search-and-management platform solve different problems, even though both touch Indian court data. Buying the wrong one means either paying for legal depth you do not need, or missing the case management and drafting tools a legal team actually depends on. For a closer look at how court-record checks fit into background verification specifically, see company background verification using court records.
02What good looks like, for each job
Since these are two different jobs, the criteria that matter are different too.
For a KYB or background-verification check, look for:
- Bulk and API access: the ability to check hundreds of names programmatically, not one at a time in a browser.
- Breadth of linked data: litigation alongside credit, GST, ITR, and company filings, so a risk decision is not made on one signal alone.
- Speed and entity matching: fast turnaround, and tolerance for spelling variations in names, since manual review of every hit does not scale.
- Compliance fit: whether it plugs into an existing KYC or onboarding workflow.
For legal case search and case work, look for:
- Full-text, citable judgments: not just a flag that a case exists, but the actual judgment text with a verified, court-ready citation.
- All-India court coverage for search: the High Courts and the Supreme Court, across enough years to be useful for research.
- Case tracking and management: hearing dates, cause lists, alerts, and a way to manage a matter over its life, not just a one-time check.
- Built for legal work: drafting support, an AI assistant that understands legal questions, and compliance automation tied to court orders.
A litigation flag in a KYC report and a court-ready citation in a legal filing are built for different readers, and mixing them up is the most common mistake in this comparison.
03Karza (Perfios) and Claw, compared
Here is each platform on its own terms, starting with the one that is genuinely the specialist for its job.
Top pick
Karza (Perfios)
A BFSI-grade KYC, KYB, and background-verification data platform, with litigation search as one module.
Strengths
- Deep, linked financial and identity data: credit bureau pulls, GST and ITR analysis, bank statement parsing, MCA company filings, and property or vehicle ownership checks, in one platform.
- Built for volume: a REST API designed for automated, bulk checks as part of lending, onboarding, or vendor and employee due diligence.
- Karza states its litigation search covers a large number of Indian courts and tribunals, including the Supreme Court, High Courts, District Courts, and specialised forums, with fast automated turnaround and tolerance for name-spelling variations.
- A strong, established choice for banks, NBFCs, and fintechs that already use it for credit and identity data, and want litigation as an added signal.
Keep in mind
- It is a data and risk-screening product, not a legal research or case-management tool. It does not offer full judgment text formatted for citation in a filing, an AI legal assistant, drafting, or hearing-by-hearing case tracking.
- Pricing is not public. Karza and Perfios work on a custom, volume-based quote for most products, typical of enterprise data-API vendors in this space.
- Built for BFSI and compliance teams. A law firm or legal department is not the primary buyer.
Best for Banks, NBFCs, lenders, and onboarding teams that need automated, bulk litigation and background checks alongside credit and identity data.
Claw
An all-in-one legaltech platform built for lawyers, law firms, and corporate legal teams to search, cite, track, and manage cases.
Strengths
- AI-based case search across 25 High Courts (1980 to 2026) and the Supreme Court (1950 to 2026), over 1.5 billion case records and 30 crore-plus judgements, with results in under 5 seconds and verified, court-ready citations.
- Case tracking and management across 8,200-plus courts, including all states, tribunals, and district courts, with auto case updates, calendar and cause-list sync, and WhatsApp and email alerts.
- An AI legal assistant, Legal GPT, plus AI auto-compliance that reads a court order and schedules the resulting reminders automatically.
- A free plan for individual advocates that includes Legal GPT, unlimited cases, case search, a daily personalised cause list, client management, and 20 GB storage. Paid plans for teams and enterprises are around Rs 10,999 per year for the Premium plan.
Keep in mind
- Claw is not a KYC, credit-bureau, or bank-statement data platform, and does not do bulk identity or financial risk screening the way Karza does. If that is the job, Karza is the better-suited tool.
- Claw does offer a public/partner API for programmatic access to court and litigation data, but exact endpoints, rate limits, and API pricing are not published here.
Best for Advocates, law firms, and in-house legal teams that need to actually search, cite, track, and manage cases, not just flag that a litigation exists.
04Side-by-side comparison
| Aspect | Karza (Perfios) | Claw |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | KYC, KYB, and background-verification data platform | All-in-one legaltech platform for legal case work |
| Litigation data | A litigation-history check or flag, one module among many | Full-text, searchable, citable judgments and live case tracking |
| Court coverage (search) | Vendor states 350 million-plus court cases across 3,500-plus courts and tribunals (claim) | 25 High Courts (1980-2026) and Supreme Court (1950-2026); 1.5 billion+ records, 30 crore+ judgements |
| Case tracking coverage | Not the primary product | 8,200+ courts incl. all states, tribunals, and district courts |
| Other data covered | Credit bureau, GST, ITR, bank statements, MCA filings, identity documents | Not applicable; legal-specific |
| Case management | Not offered | Yes: calendar, cause lists, alerts, MIS reports, Claw Notebooks |
| AI legal assistant | Not offered | Yes: Legal GPT plus AI auto-compliance from court orders |
| Access model | REST API, built for bulk automated checks | Web platform plus API for programmatic access |
| Pricing | Custom, quote-based | Free plan for individual advocates; paid seats roughly Rs 10,999/yr for teams |
| Built for | BFSI, lending, and onboarding teams | Advocates, law firms, corporate legal teams |
05How to choose
This is less a head-to-head and more a fork in the road, based on the job you actually have.
If you are a bank, NBFC, lender, or onboarding team that needs to run automated, bulk checks on individuals or companies, and litigation history is one signal among credit, GST, and identity data, Karza (Perfios) is built for exactly that. If you are a lawyer, law firm, or corporate legal team that needs to search and cite judgments, track hearings, manage matters, and get AI drafting help, Claw is built for that instead. If your organisation needs both, for example a bank with an in-house legal team, it is common to run a KYB or background-verification platform for onboarding and risk, and a separate legal case-search-and-management platform for the legal department, since neither is a substitute for the other.
To see more options in each category, browse AICA alternatives and Perfios litigation search API alternatives.
06Where Claw fits
Claw is an all-in-one legaltech platform for Indian advocates, law firms, and corporate legal teams, combining AI-based case search, an AI legal assistant (Legal GPT), case management, and compliance automation across all Indian courts and tribunals.
For litigation and court data specifically, Claw is not trying to be a KYC or KYB data aggregator, and it does not compete with Karza on bulk background-verification checks across credit, GST, and identity data. Claw’s job is the legal work itself: an all-India AI case search over 1.5 billion-plus case records and 30 crore-plus judgements, verified court-ready citations, case tracking across 8,200-plus courts, and an AI legal assistant and compliance automation built for how lawyers and legal teams actually work. If your search for a "Karza litigation check alternative" was really a search for a tool to help your legal team find, cite, track, and manage cases, that is the gap Claw is built to fill. For court-record checks in a background-verification context specifically, see company background verification using court records.
07Sources and further reading
The platforms discussed here, linked to their official sources:
- Perfios (Karza’s current parent brand): perfios.ai
- Karza (legacy domain, now redirects to Perfios): karza.in
- Claw: clawlaw.in
- Ministry of Corporate Affairs (official company filings): mca.gov.in
This is not an exhaustive comparison of every KYB or litigation-data vendor. Coverage and pricing figures for Karza and Perfios are vendor claims as published on their own sites at the time of writing, and should be confirmed directly before you rely on them.
08Frequently asked questions
Is Karza the same company as Perfios?
Karza Technologies was acquired by Perfios Software Solutions in 2022, and its products, including litigation and KYB checks, are now offered under the Perfios brand. The "Karza" name is still widely searched because it was the well-known name before the acquisition.
Is Karza (Perfios) a legal research tool?
No. Karza (Perfios) is a KYC, KYB, and background-verification data platform used mainly by banks, NBFCs, and lenders. A litigation-history check is one module in a broader risk and onboarding product, not a legal research or case-citation tool.
What is the main difference between Karza (Perfios) and Claw?
Karza (Perfios) flags whether a litigation exists as part of a bulk background check across credit, GST, and identity data. Claw is built for legal teams to actually find and cite the judgment, track hearings, and manage the case, alongside an AI legal assistant and compliance automation.
Which one should a law firm use?
A law firm or corporate legal team doing legal case work, research, citation, and matter management is better served by a legaltech platform like Claw. A litigation-check API like Karza (Perfios) is built for BFSI risk and onboarding teams, not for running a legal practice.
Does Claw offer bulk background checks like Karza?
No. Claw is a legaltech platform for case search, case management, and compliance automation, not a KYC or KYB data aggregator. Organisations that need both jobs done typically use a background-verification platform for onboarding or risk, and a separate legal platform like Claw for their legal team.
How much does each platform cost?
Karza/Perfios pricing is custom and quote-based, typical of enterprise data-API products. Claw has a free plan for individual advocates, and paid team or enterprise plans are roughly Rs 10,999 per year for the Premium plan, which also includes case management and AI tools.