Claw vs Signzy (for Onboarding and Litigation Checks)
Signzy is a strong KYC and KYB onboarding platform. If what you actually need is a litigation check, meaning whether a person or company has pending or past court cases, that is a different job. Here is how the two compare, honestly.
Comparison · Onboarding vs Litigation Check
If you searched for a litigation check alternative to Signzy, you have probably run into a mismatch: Signzy is built to verify who someone is and onboard them fast, not to search decades of Indian court records for pending or past litigation against them. Both jobs matter for risk and compliance, but they are not the same tool. This page explains the difference, gives Signzy full credit for what it does well, and looks at where a dedicated litigation and case search platform like Claw fits instead.
- Signzy’s job: KYC/KYB identity and business onboarding verification, built for scale and speed.
- Claw’s job: AI litigation and case-law search across Indian courts, plus case tracking after a hit.
- They are not substitutes: onboarding verification and a litigation check answer different questions.
- Many teams use both: an onboarding/KYB check for identity, and a separate litigation check for court history.
01Onboarding verification and litigation check are not the same job
The confusion is understandable. Both KYC/KYB platforms and litigation search tools sit under the same broad umbrella of "risk and compliance", and both are used before a business signs up a customer, vendor, or partner. But they solve different problems.
What Signzy solves: fast, verified onboarding
Signzy is a KYC and KYB (Know Your Business) verification platform. Its job is to confirm identity and business legitimacy quickly, at scale, inside an onboarding flow: government ID checks, document OCR, liveness and biometric checks, business database lookups, UBO (ultimate beneficial owner) screening, and AML screening. This is real, credit-worthy work. Banks, NBFCs, and fintechs run thousands of onboarding checks a day and need those checks to be automated, fast, and API-driven, which is exactly what a platform like Signzy is built for.
What a litigation check solves: has this party been in court
A litigation check asks a different question: does this person or company have pending cases, past judgments, or a litigation history in Indian courts. Answering that requires searching case law and court records across the Supreme Court and the High Courts (and, for ongoing matters, tracking live case status across many more courts and tribunals). That is a case-search and case-tracking problem, not an identity-verification problem, and it needs a very different kind of database and search engine underneath it.
A different job, explained
If you are unsure whether you need identity/background verification or a court litigation search, see our explainer on litigation check vs background check. Many teams end up needing both, run by two different specialists.
02What good litigation-check coverage looks like
If your real need is checking a party’s litigation history rather than verifying their identity, four things matter.
- Court coverage: how many years and how many courts the search actually reaches, since a gap in coverage is a gap in your risk picture.
- Name-tolerant search: Indian names and company names are recorded inconsistently across courts, so a search that only matches exact spellings will miss real hits.
- Verified, citable results: a litigation flag has to hold up if a compliance team or a client asks for the source, not just a match score.
- What happens after a hit: if a check does surface a pending case, you usually need to track that matter going forward, which is a case-management job, not a one-time check.
An onboarding check confirms who someone is. A litigation check asks whether the courts already know them. They need different tools underneath.
03Signzy and Claw, compared
We start with Signzy’s real strength, because it is a genuine specialist in its category and that matters to anyone comparing the two.
Top pick
Signzy
A KYC and KYB onboarding and compliance verification platform built for regulated businesses.
Strengths
- Strong, API-first identity and business verification: government ID checks, document OCR, liveness and biometric checks, UBO and AML screening, built to plug into an onboarding flow.
- Designed for scale and speed, which is exactly what banks, NBFCs, and fintechs need when onboarding large customer or vendor volumes.
- Signzy states it serves several hundred financial institutions and has verified a large volume of businesses and users globally.
Keep in mind
- Its primary job is identity and business onboarding verification, not case-law or litigation research. Any litigation or criminal-record screening it offers reads as a database check bundled into background verification, not a full court case search across Indian courts.
- Pricing is demo and quote based, not published, which is normal for enterprise onboarding platforms but means you cannot compare cost without a sales conversation.
Best for Banks, NBFCs, fintechs, and other regulated businesses that need fast, automated KYC/KYB onboarding at scale.
Claw
AI-based litigation and case search across Indian courts, built for the "has this party been in court" question, with case tracking after a hit.
Strengths
- Case search across 25 High Courts (1980 to 2026) and the Supreme Court (1950 to 2026), covering 1.5 billion+ records and 30 crore+ judgements, so a litigation check reaches deep and wide, not just recent filings.
- Name-tolerant search (proximity and phonetic matching), which matters when a party’s name is spelled differently across court records, exactly the kind of gap that causes a litigation check to miss a real hit.
- Results in under 5 seconds, with verified, court-ready citations rather than an unverifiable match score.
- If a check does surface a pending matter, Claw also does case tracking and management across 8200 or more courts and tribunals, so the same platform can follow that case going forward instead of handing you a one-time flag.
- Claw offers API access for programmatic litigation and case-law lookups, so it can sit inside a risk or onboarding workflow the same way a verification API does.
Keep in mind
- Claw is not a KYC/KYB or identity-verification platform. It does not do government ID checks, document OCR, liveness/biometric verification, or AML/UBO screening, which is exactly where Signzy specialises.
Best for Legal, compliance, and risk teams that need to check whether a party has litigation history in Indian courts, and to track any matter that turns up.
04Side-by-side comparison
| Aspect | Signzy | Claw |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | KYC/KYB identity and business onboarding verification | Litigation and case-law search, plus case tracking |
| Core checks | ID verification, document OCR, liveness/biometric, UBO, AML/database screening | Court judgement search, party-name litigation history, live case status tracking |
| Court/case coverage | Not its focus; litigation screening appears limited to database checks | 25 High Courts (1980-2026) + Supreme Court (1950-2026) for search; 8200+ courts and tribunals for tracking |
| Search approach | Database and document matching | AI/semantic search with name-tolerant (phonetic/proximity) matching |
| Speed | Not published | Under 5 seconds for search results |
| API access | Yes, API-first onboarding platform | Yes, API access for court and litigation data |
| Pricing model | Demo/quote based, not public | Public pricing from Rs 1,099/month; free plan for individual advocates |
| Best for | Fast, compliant customer/vendor onboarding at scale | Litigation risk checks and ongoing case tracking |
05How to choose
Start from the question you are actually trying to answer, not the category label.
If you need to onboard customers, vendors, or partners quickly and confirm who they are, that is KYC/KYB, and a platform built for it, such as Signzy, is the right tool. If you are comparing onboarding and background-verification platforms broadly, our AuthBridge alternatives guide covers that category in more depth. If you need to know whether a party has pending or past litigation in Indian courts, that is a case-search job, and it needs a court-search engine, not an onboarding API. See our guide to litigation check APIs in India for options built specifically for that. If you need both, most compliance teams end up running an onboarding/KYB check and a separate litigation check side by side, since a single platform rarely does both jobs well.
06Where Claw fits
Claw is an all-in-one legaltech platform for Indian advocates, law firms, and corporate legal teams, combining AI-based case search, an AI legal assistant (Legal GPT), case management, and compliance automation across all Indian courts and tribunals. It is positioned as India’s first all-in-one legaltech platform of this kind.
Claw is not trying to compete with Signzy on identity verification or KYB onboarding, and it does not offer document OCR, liveness checks, or AML/UBO screening. Where Claw fits is the question that comes right after onboarding, or alongside it: does this party have a litigation history, and if a case turns up, who is going to track it. Claw’s AI case search covers 25 High Courts and the Supreme Court with verified, court-ready citations and name-tolerant matching, and the same subscription covers case tracking across 8200 or more courts if a flagged matter needs to be followed. For teams that also want the litigation check reachable through an API alongside their onboarding stack, Claw offers API access to its court and litigation data.
07Sources and further reading
The platforms discussed here, linked to their official sources:
- Signzy: signzy.com
- Claw: clawlaw.in
Signzy’s feature scope, client base, and scale figures are as stated on its own website and public listings at the time of writing, and should be confirmed directly with Signzy before being relied on. This is not an exhaustive comparison of every onboarding or litigation-check vendor in India.
08Frequently asked questions
Is Signzy a litigation check tool?
Not primarily. Signzy is a KYC and KYB onboarding verification platform. Any litigation or criminal-record screening it offers appears to be a background-check style database lookup bundled into onboarding, rather than a dedicated search across Indian court records and judgements. If a full litigation check across courts is what you need, a case-search platform like Claw is built for that specific job.
What is the difference between Signzy and Claw?
Signzy verifies identity and business legitimacy for onboarding: ID checks, document verification, UBO and AML screening. Claw searches Indian court judgements and tracks live cases, to answer whether a party has litigation history or a pending matter. They solve different problems and are often used together, not as alternatives to each other.
Can I use Claw as a Signzy alternative?
For onboarding verification such as ID checks or KYB, no, Claw does not do that. If what sent you looking for an alternative to Signzy is specifically a litigation check, meaning searching court records for a party’s case history, then yes, that is exactly the job Claw is built for.
Does Claw have an API like Signzy?
Yes. Claw offers API access for programmatic access to its court and litigation data, so a litigation check can be built into a workflow the same way a verification API is. Specific technical details such as endpoints, rate limits, and API pricing should be confirmed directly with Claw.
How much does Signzy cost compared to Claw?
Signzy is priced on a demo and custom quote basis, which is common for enterprise onboarding platforms, so the cost depends on your volume and requirements. Claw publishes its pricing, starting around Rs 1,099 per month (roughly Rs 10,999 a year) for case search and management, and also offers a free plan for individual advocates. Enterprise and team plans on both sides are typically quote-based.
Why would a compliance team need both an onboarding tool and a litigation-check tool?
Because they answer different questions in a risk workflow. Onboarding verification confirms who a party is at the point of signup. A litigation check tells you whether that party has been, or currently is, involved in court cases, which is ongoing risk information that an identity-verification platform is not built to surface.